The Policy Context and Public Consultation: A Consideration of Transgenic Salmon

Authors

  • Emily Marden IP law and regulatory policy, Associate at Sidley and Austin, New York
  • Holly Longstaff W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia, Vanc
  • Ed Levy W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia, Vanc

Keywords:

Transgenic salmon, biotechnology regulation, public consultation

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to begin to tease out the complexity of the relationship between policymaking and consultations in the U.S. and Canada. We do this in the context of genetically modified (GM) salmon, which involves a particularly entangled set of regulatory regimes. In exploring this relationship, we seek to lay the groundwork for demonstrating that the design, implementation, interpretation, and evaluation of public consultations need to take account of the policy arena. We use the term “policy” broadly here to refer to both legislative and administrative regimes designed to manage or implement a technology. We do not posit here that the policy regime should determine the public consultation. Rather, just as the underlying science is important to the design of the public consultation, so too is the policy regime. Thus, we think it necessary to take account of the policy arena they aim to influence in the same manner that designers of public consultation take some account of the science underlying the issues.

Downloads

Published

2006-07-03

Issue

Section

Articles