Résumé
Today, the voluntary return of refugees to their country of origin is widely perceived as the most preferred and durable solution. Yet, while voluntary repatriation is a desirable ideal – not least because most refugees themselves wish to return ‘home – ‘ the international community’s development strategies to ensure its sustainability have, all too often, been unavailing. Specifically, and using a comparative case study approach to the return experiences in post-conflict Burundi and Rwanda, this dissertation finds that – without political will on part of the ‘home’ state and the international donors – efforts to facilitate genuine homecoming will remain inadequate. And, may inadvertently, contribute to further instability. Fundamentally, the findings underscore the urgent need that, apart from the adoption of development-led approaches, the international community should pursue comprehensive state-building activities so as to create benign post-conflict states willing to open-up public goods for all returnees.

Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
© Steve Flynn 2025