Longitudinal Monitoring of Physiological Variables during Mechanical Ventilation and Weaning in Intensive Care

Main Article Content

Aaron John

Abstract

Mechanical Ventilation (MV) is used with 40% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients to assist breathing (1,2). A deleterious effect of MV includes rapid (i.e., within 18-69 hours) atrophy of the diaphragm muscle, which compromises the ability of patients to breathe independently (3). These patients have lower indices of weaning success and higher mortality (4–6). A previous study monitored physiological data during liberation procedures called spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) and identified variables predictive of weaning success (7). However, that study was limited by its brief monitoring period and small sample size. Overall, a relative dearth exists of studies that compare ventilated patients who pass and fail SBT. The purpose of this study is to describe the trends in physiological variables during MV and SBTs. We are conducting a retrospective, secondary analysis of data collected from 37 ICU patients, all of whom were ventilated for greater than 48 hours. Of those, 27 passed an SBT, 5 failed, and 5 did not undergo an SBT. Descriptive statistics and data visualizations will be computed in R. Of the 17 variables that were measured, we expect to see consistent trends in blood pressure, heart rate, minute ventilation, end tidal carbon dioxide, and derived variables because of their responsiveness to physical stress. We will compare the trends in patients who passed an SBT to those who did not. This research will provide a foundation for future studies that seek to evaluate physiological predictors of weaning outcomes.

Article Details

Section
Innovations to Improve Healthcare

References

1. Esteban A, Anzueto A, Alía I, Gordo F, Apezteguía C, Pálizas F, et al. How Is Mechanical Ventilation Employed in the Intensive Care Unit?: An International Utilization Review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 May 1;161(5):1450–8.

2. Pham T, Brochard LJ, Slutsky AS. Mechanical Ventilation: State of the Art. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Sept;92(9):1382–400.

3. Levine S, Budak MT, Sonnad S, Shrager JB. Rapid Disuse Atrophy of Diaphragm Fibers in Mechanically Ventilated Humans. N Engl J Med. 2008;

4. Burns KEA, Rizvi L, Cook DJ, Seely AJE, Rochwerg B, Lamontagne F, et al. Frequency of Screening and SBT Technique Trial - North American Weaning Collaboration (FAST-NAWC): a protocol for a multicenter, factorial randomized trial. Trials. 2019 Oct 11;20(1):587.

5. Dolinay T, Hsu L, Maller A, Walsh BC, Szűcs A, Jerng JS, et al. Ventilator Weaning in Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation—A Narrative Review. J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 26;13(7):1909.

6. Akella P, Voigt LP, Chawla S. To Wean or Not to Wean: A Practical Patient Focused Guide to Ventilator Weaning. J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Nov;37(11):1417–25.

7. Lee IH, Kuo YW, Lin FC, Wu CW, Jerng JS, Kuo PH, et al. Kinetics of oxygen uptake during unassisted breathing trials in prolonged mechanical ventilation: a prospective pilot study. Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 31;10(1):14301.