Evaluating Locke’s Theory of Justified Rebellion Against the State

Abstract

This paper examines John Locke’s theory of justified rebellion as outlined in his Second Treatise of Government, supporting his claim that citizens are justified in revolting against a government that fails to protect their natural rights to life, liberty, and property. If a government breaches the social contract and acts against its people, its authority is forfeited, and the people should be released from obedience. A modern example of a revolution in Nepal is used to support this argument. The paper then addresses the anticipated objection that Locke’s theory encourages frequent rebellions over trivial issues, concluding that only a “long train of abuses” justifies a legitimate rebellion.